The Very Sad Truth.......
This is kind of funny................. but not really ..... One of the most remarkable things about this is that both Rummy and dubya's dick were complicit in this activity when dubya's sperm donor and Ronald Reagan were presidents. The fact that they specifically enriched themselves in all this, and continue to do so to this day is so sickening.
I know that this is not new news. God knows there is tons of new news. We read about it every goddamm day. In fact, there is so much goddamm new news that I truly don't quite know what to write about. So, I tend to return to basics. The most basic thing there is is that these bums, these scumsucking vermin are killing people with the same policy they created in the 1980's AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS STILL NOT COVERING ANY OF IT.
Talk given at Teach-in on Iraq, Cornell University, October 22, 2002
What will also become clear in an examination of US-Iraq relations before the Gulf War is the extremely bad judgment shown by these same officials, and the pattern of deception, secrecy and lies by which they sought to cover up those mistakes. What we will see is that the people now running US foreign policy were in the 1980s directly responsible for supplying Saddam Hussein with the materials as well as the diplomatic and military support necessary for him to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction.
............... snip...............
Over the course of the 1980s, two Republican administrations, and individuals who are once again running US foreign policy, supplied Saddam Hussein with the means to wage brutal warfare against his neighbors and his own citizens; supplied him with the means to make nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, with the means to build missile technology. (All of these weapons, as well as the facilities, research and otherwise, were destroyed or dismantled before UNSCOM was pulled out of Iraq in 1998.)
Where was their concern about Saddam Hussein then? Why are Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney only now suddenly worried about Saddam Hussein, when as recently as a couple of years ago the company Cheney headed was doing deals with him?
Based on this history, there is absolutely no reason to take this administration's word on anything related to Iraq.
Arming Iraq: How George H. W. Bush and Ronald Reagan helped Iraq Develop their Weapons of Mass Destruction
The biggest irony aside from the fact that these men who avoided military service are so eager to spill blood is that Dubya would not be going to war in order to destroy Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction if his father had not enthusiastically sold them to Hussein in the first place. Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of weapons and provided the technology for Saddam's chemical, biological and nuclear programs.
...........snip...........
CIA contractors brokered deals for billions of dollars worth of weapons for Iraq. One such asset, Sarkis Soghanglian claimed the administration was aware of his sale of 45 Bell helicopters to Saddam.
Dow Chemical wanted to ship pesticides that acted like nerve gas on humans. Sidewinder components were transshipped through Italy to Iraq.
The gassing of the Kurds in 1984 by Iraq pilots, presumably flying these helicopters did not deter the administration which turned a blind eye towards Saddam's excesses. The administration then sold Iraq $220 million worth of trucks. They continued to provide backing for Saddam even after they knew he was developing a nuclear capability. Iraqi scientists were even brought over to the U.S. to attend symposiums on nuclear programs sponsored by Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore. Warnings by government employees about this dangerous program went unheeded. Whistle blowers were fired.
Anyone with a bit of energy and a bit of curiosity can find this information easily on the web. It's all here for the world to see. All I did was go to Google, and search on "cheney weapons sales iraq", but without the quotes. So, so sad.........
2 comment(s):
The US has long had a problem with clients who outlive their usefulness. When the Soviet Union dumped Somolia as a client when Ethiopia became their friend, the US picked up Somolia. Look how friendly we and Somolia are now. And Noriega? A real good friend. And the the Afghan Islamic resistance to the Soviet Union? I think we have heard something more from some of these same people, like Osama.
If our foreign policy was based on long term interests, at least we would keep the same cast of characters. I started to say, "principles," but I'm afraid the foreign policy establishment doen't have what would generally be called principles.
By Anonymous, at 9:52 PM
You're right, Michael. The word "principle" insinuates something benevolent or good. These guys have replaced "principles" with hypocrisy. But, it's not even that. It's selfishness gone beyond the pale. It's a self-serving mentality that has nothing to do with governing. As I recently heard from somewhere on TV, "The republicans are good at getting elected. They're just terrible at governing." It's because they are completely unprincipled. I feel really sorry for the families of the victims of the Iraqi debaucle, Iraqis as well as Americans. They've paid the highest price for the republican and neocon hypocrisy. It's the saddest.........
By Dusty Dog, at 7:19 AM
Post a comment
<< Home